HR Insights · Myanmar

Is a non-compete clause enforceable in Myanmar?

Non-compete clauses are enforceable in Myanmar only if reasonable — typically 6 months max, narrow geography, and tied to a specific role.

QC
QHRM Content Team
HR & Compliance Editors
May 3, 2026
3 min read

What Myanmar law says

A non-compete clause prevents the employee from joining a competitor or starting a competing business for a period after leaving. Under the Employment & Skills Development Law (ESDL) 2013 framework, non-compete clauses are enforceable in Myanmar only if they pass a reasonableness test — narrowly tailored in duration, geography, and scope, and tied to a legitimate business interest such as protection of trade secrets or client relationships. Overly broad non-compete clauses (e.g., "anywhere in the world for 5 years") are routinely held unenforceable.

Reasonableness factors Myanmar courts consider

  • Duration — typical maximum 6 months post-employment; longer durations rarely upheld.
  • Geography — should match where the employer actually competes (city, region, country).
  • Scope — limited to roles or industries where the employee had access to confidential information.
  • Consideration — was the employee compensated for the restraint (e.g., garden leave, salary continuation)?
  • Seniority — non-compete more enforceable for senior staff with access to trade secrets than for junior staff.
  • Legitimate business interest — protecting client relationships, trade secrets, or specialised training investment.

Drafting tips

ElementReasonableUnreasonable
Duration3 – 6 months2+ years
GeographyYangon and Mandalay regions"Anywhere in the world"
ScopeDirect competitors in the same industryAny business activity
Role coverageSenior or technical rolesAll employees blanket
ConsiderationSalary continuation during the restraintNone
Download the QHRM restrictive-covenant pack Bilingual non-compete, non-solicit, and NDA templates calibrated to Myanmar enforceability standards.
Get the templates →

What if there's a dispute

  • Township labour office first — typical complaint is the employer over-broad non-compete clause restricting the employee from finding work.
  • Conciliation Body — formal conciliation under the Settlement of Labour Disputes Law.
  • Arbitration Council — final binding step. Statute of limitations: typically 6 months.

Employer takeaway

Limit non-compete clauses to senior or technical roles, set duration at 3–6 months max, define geography narrowly, and identify the legitimate business interest. Pair the restraint with consideration (e.g., garden-leave salary continuation) to improve enforceability. Run final settlement within 7 days of last working day, deregister from SSB within 30 days, and keep records for at least 7 years.

For HR teams running terminations across regions
Run a clean exit, every time. QHRM stores enforceable restrictive-covenant templates and tracks active restraints across leavers — used by 350+ Myanmar employers.

Edge cases and unenforceable clauses

  • Non-compete with no consideration — weakens enforceability significantly.
  • Non-solicit clauses — generally more readily enforceable; see non-solicit.
  • NDA clauses — enforceable for trade secrets; see NDAs.
  • See maximum non-compete duration.

Common non-compete mistakes

  • Copying a multinational global template with 2-year worldwide non-compete.
  • Applying non-compete to junior or operational staff.
  • Skipping consideration (no garden-leave salary).
  • Failing to define "competitor" with specificity.
Share this articleLast updated May 3, 2026
QC
QHRM Content Team
HR & Compliance Editors · Yangon

We publish practical, legally-grounded HR guidance for Myanmar employers. Each piece is reviewed by our compliance team against current MLIP and Labor Law requirements.

More from the QHRM Blog

All articles →